- Title
- How can hospitals change practice to better implement smoking cessation interventions? A systematic review
- Creator
- Ugalde, Anna; White, Victoria; Rankin, Nicole M.; Paul, Christine; Segan, Catherine; Aranda, Sanchia; Wong Shee, Anna Wong; Hutchinson, Alison M.; Livingston, Patricia M.
- Relation
- CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians Vol. 72, Issue 3, p. 266-286
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21709
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2022
- Description
- Smoking cessation reduces the risk of death, improves recovery, and reduces the risk of hospital readmission. Evidence and policy support hospital admission as an ideal time to deliver smoking-cessation interventions. However, this is not well implemented in practice. In this systematic review, the authors summarize the literature on smoking-cessation implementation strategies and evaluate their success to guide the implementation of best-practice smoking interventions into hospital settings. The CINAHL Complete, Embase, MEDLINE Complete, and PsycInfo databases were searched using terms associated with the following topics: smoking cessation, hospitals, and implementation. In total, 14,287 original records were identified and screened, resulting in 63 eligible articles from 56 studies. Data were extracted on the study characteristics, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes were guided by Proctor and colleagues' framework and included acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. The findings demonstrate that studies predominantly focused on the training of staff to achieve implementation. Brief implementation approaches using a small number of implementation strategies were less successful and poorly sustained compared with well resourced and multicomponent approaches. Although brief implementation approaches may be viewed as advantageous because they are less resource-intensive, their capacity to change practice in a sustained way lacks evidence. Attempts to change clinician behavior or introduce new models of care are challenging in a short time frame, and implementation efforts should be designed for long-term success. There is a need to embrace strategic, well planned implementation approaches to embed smoking-cessation interventions into hospitals and to reap and sustain the benefits for people who smoke.
- Subject
- hospitals; implementation; implementation outcomes; implementation strategies; smoking policy; tobacco control; SDG 3; Sustainable Development Goals
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1470770
- Identifier
- uon:48549
- Identifier
- ISSN:0007-9235
- Rights
- © 2021 The Authors. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 2484
- Visitors: 2604
- Downloads: 127
Collections
Goal 3: Good Health and Well-Being
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Publisher version (open access) | 216 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |